Legal Opinion

Curry v. Clayton

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided June 24, 1986No. 05-85-01264-CVPublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCALES, Justice.

Curry, the defendant below, appeals from a summary judgment rendered in favor of Clayton, the plaintiff below. In his sole ground of error, Curry contends that “the trial court erred in granting summary judgment based upon the court’s interpretation of Rule 169, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, that it did not have discretion to allow the late filing of responses” to Clayton’s requests for admissions. We hold that the trial court had discretion to strike admissions which had been deemed admitted under Rule 169 and to permit the late filing of responses to requests for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. Bragg, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
  2. Overstreet v. Home Indemnity CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Overstreet v. Home Indemnity Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  4. Agristor Credit Corp. v. DonahoeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Packer v. First Texas Savings Ass'n of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Fibreboard Corp. v. PoolCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Esparza v. DiazCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Halton, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  5. Rozsa v. Jenkinson, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API