Legal Opinion
Bowles v. Etheridge
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 1, 1933No. 8953PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
“Mandamus will not lie to compel a public officer to do an act not clearly commanded by law, nor is one entitled to the writ unless it be made to appear that he has a clear legal right to have the particular act performed, the doing of which he seeks to have enforced.” Cureton v. Wheeler, 172 Ga. 879 (159 S. E. 283). It was not error to refuse a mandamus absolute.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cureton v. WheelerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
3Cited by2 opinions
- Trussell v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Jowers v. GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964