Legal Opinion

United States v. Harold Tasto

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 22, 1978No. 78-5211PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The search warrant was not invalid. The government concedes that the affidavit erroneously stated that when three chemicals, constituents in the manufacture of PCP (a controlled substance), were combined with a fourth chemical substance PCP would be produced. An expert testified that six chemicals are required to produce PCP. The appellant has not established that the misstatement by the affiant was either intentional or made with reckless disregard for the truth. Franks v. Delaware, --U.S. -, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978). Moreover, even if the erroneous information were deleted there…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. Laurel Joan MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert Lee HouseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  2. United States v. Rafael Perez-Leon & Juan GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Charles Allen Stout, John Mark JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. Peter KreimesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. George RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API