Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Adams

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided May 13, 2008No. 07-0796/AFPublished

1Dissent

ERDMANN, Judge,

with whom RYAN, Judge joins (dissenting):

The power to convene courts-martial and to detail members to those courts-martial rests solely in those commanders that Congress, the President, or the Secretary concerned empowered to take those actions. See Articles 22, 23, 24, 25, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 822, 823, 824, 825 (2000). A convening authority’s actions create the structural basis of a courts-martial and when the plain language of the convening authority’s order is clear, complete, and unambiguous, that order must be given effect. See United…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. PadillaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  2. United States v. GebhartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  3. United States v. HarnishUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  4. United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  5. United States v. GloverUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API