Legal Opinion

Keaulii v. Simpson

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1993No. 15645PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LUM, C.J.

This case involves the question of whether the circuit court may impose sanctions, under Rule 26(A) of the Hawaii Arbitration Rules (HAR), against a party who appeals from an unfavorable arbitration decision but dismisses the case “with prejudice” before the evidentiary portion of the trial.

For the reasons set forth below, we hold that for purposes of Rule 26 of the HAR a circuit court’s decision to grant a party’s motion to dismiss with prejudice is a “decision rendered in a trial de novo” for which sanctions may be imposed.

I

This case arises out of a September…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. AgnewIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Astron Industrial Associates, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  4. Kealoha v. County of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. KumukauHawaii Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Sport Shinko (Waikiki Corp.)Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. DaviaHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Housing Finance & Development Corp. v. CastleHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. LauHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Gump v. Walmart Stores, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API