Legal Opinion

Internet Payments Patents Ltd. v. PayPal Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 27, 2026No. 5:25-cv-00380Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 INTERNET PAYMENTS PATENTS LTD., Case No. 25-cv-00380-SVK 8 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 92 10 PAYPAL INC, 11 Defendant. 12 Plaintiff Internet Payments Patents Ltd. (“IPPL”) alleges that Defendant PayPal Inc. 13 infringes several claims of

U.S. Patent No. 7,483,858. Dkt. 2 (First Amended Complaint or 14 “FAC”). The FAC originally also included claims for misappropriation of trade secrets under the 15 Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act and the Texas Uniform Trade Secrets Act, but IPPL has 16…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API