Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Cendant Corp. & Subsidiaries v. Department of Revenue

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 2, 2009No. 08CA0103Published

1Concurrence

Judge CONNELLY

specially concurring.

Cendant's claim rests on the premise that state taxing authorities have a constitutional obligation, rooted in due process, to provide affirmative notice of potentially favorable tax code strategies. The majority opinion accepts this premise but concludes the Colorado Department of Revenue (DOR) provided sufficient notice to satisfy due process. Because I would reject the premise, I concur in the result but not in the majority's reasoning.

Tax codes are notoriously abstruse. An eminent judge who authored many landmark tax opinions onee described the federal…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API