Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Slimp

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 13, 1995No. 1930499PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a workers' compensation case, and the question presented is whether the worker presented evidence that his employer had "actual knowledge" of his alleged work-related injury. The trial court found that the worker's injury was work-related, and that he was totally and permanently disabled.

The trial court, in its order, stated that "Mr. Slimp testified that on the date of his accident, he notified his direct supervisor, Randy Gillis, that he had hurt his back that day," and that "Mr. Gillis did not come to Court to deny Mr. Slimp's testimony in this regard, nor was any testimony offered…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Russell Coal Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  2. DeHart v. Ideal Basic Industries, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  3. Cook v. MunnCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  4. International Paper Co. v. MurrayCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  5. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. WattsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. MID-SOUTH ELEC. CO., INC. v. JonesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  2. City of Hoover v. PhillipsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  3. D & E Investments, L.L.C. v. SingletonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  4. D & E Investments, L.L.C. v. SingletonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  5. D & E Investments, L.L.C. v. SingletonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API