Legal Opinion

Oral Roberts University v. Anderson

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided January 8, 1997No. 4:95-cv-00583Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HOLMES, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket # 9), Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 27), and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 46).

I

For the purposes of this motion, the facts of this case are not in dispute. Plaintiff Oral Roberts University (“ORU”), as “Seller,” and Defendant Travis Anderson, as “Purchaser,” entered into a certain Option and Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Estate dated September 27, 1994, (the “Agreement”). On October 25,1994, Mr. Anderson conveyed his interest…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Windon Third Oil And Gas Drilling Partnership v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  5. Lindhorst v. WrightCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API