Legal Opinion

Thomas & Cross v. Brown

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 12, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Hustings Court, Part II, of the city of Richmond, in an action of assumpsit. Judg-ment for the defendant. Plaintiffs assign error.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This action was brought by the firm of Thomas & Cross to recover of Harvey C. Brown $450.54, a balance alleged to be due them from the defendant on a parol contract for building certain houses. There was a verdict for the plaintiffs for the amount claimed by them, subject to the opinion of the court upon a demurrer to the evidence by the defendant. The court sustained the demurrer to the evidence, and we are asked to review that judgment.

It appears from the record that in December, 1910, the plaintiffs and the defendant entered into an oral contract whereby the former undertook to build…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lee v. HarlowSupreme Court of Virginia · 1880
  2. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1883
  3. Standard Sewing Machine Co. v. GunterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  4. Seymour v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Virginia · 1885

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blanton v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. (In Re Blanton)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
  2. Virginia-Carolina Electrical Works, Inc. v. CooperSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  3. Atkins v. BoatwrightSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API