Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Diaz v. Lockheed Electronics

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 1980No. 4419Published

1ConcurrenceSutin, Judge

(specially concurring).

I specially concur.

Plaintiffs, when discharged as employees of Lockheed, sued defendants for damages arising out of defendants’ conduct which “deprived each Plaintiff of his liberty without lawful justification and amounted to false arrest, false imprisonment and kidnapping .. ..” Defendants were granted summary judgment and plaintiffs appeal.

In summary judgment proceedings, defendants must first make a prima facie showing that there was no genuine issue of material fact as to false imprisonment. The burden then shifts to plaintiffs to come forward and demonstrate that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  2. City of Newport Beach v. SasseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Commonwealth v. StorteckySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Steinbaugh v. Payless Drug Store, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Burlington Transp. Co. v. JosephsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API