Legal Opinion

Elmore v. Graystone of Centralia, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1963No. 36365PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment (a) dismissing their action for rescission of a contract and (b) foreclosing defendant’s labor and materialmen’s lien for the construction of a concrete silo built pursuant to the contract.

Plaintiffs make 9 assignments of error: 5 to findings of fact entered; 3 to findings of fact requested but refused; and 1 to entry of judgment.

The first two categories of assignments of error present nothing but a conflicting interpretation by the parties of the evidence. The trial judge remarked, “There is considerable dispute in the evidence.” A review of the record…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Hopkins v. UlvestadWashington Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. National Bank of Commerce of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Gannon v. EmtmanWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Elmore v. Graystone of Centralia, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API