Legal Opinion

State v. Strohbeen

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 16, 1988No. 88-0506-CR, 88-0507-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

Curtis Strohbeen appeals from judgments convicting and sentencing him for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated and operating after revocation, and from orders denying his motion to modify the sentences. Strohbeen contends that the trial court lacked the authority to stay the execution of his sentences for twenty-eight days, so as to cause the sentences to run consecutive to a commitment for non-payment of a civil forfeiture he was already serving in Dodge county. We interpret sec. 973.15, Stats., to harmonize with secs. 973.07 and 345.47, Stats., and conclude that the trial court may…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. KenyonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. KruseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Marshall-Wisconsin Co. v. Juneau Square Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. BoettcherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  2. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  3. State v. HarrCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  4. State v. SzulczewskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  5. State v. HarrCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API