Legal Opinion
Hertz, Newmark & Warner v. Fischman
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided March 22, 1967PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSidney Gold, J.
The order for a reference dated November 2, 1966 directed “ a hearing on the issues both of the timely service of defendant’s answer and the personal jurisdiction over the person of the defendant, and for final disposition of the motion ”.
The plaintiff has waived the objection that the answer was not timely served. The only other issue is as to the jurisdiction of the court over the person of the defendant.
At the outset of the hearing an issue was raised as to the timeliness of this motion under CPLR 3211 (su-bd. [a], par. 8) inasmuch as the motion was made after answer. However, such an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Winick v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Glassman v. HyderAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1966
- Glassman v. HyderCivil Court of the City of New York · 1966
3Cited by11 opinions
- Klein v. BowerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Davis v. NehfAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Klein v. BowerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Friedr. Zoellner (New York) Corp. v. Tex Metals Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Orient Mid-East Lines, Inc. v. Albert E. Bowen, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.