Legal Opinion

Higley v. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 28, 1988No. 70689PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KOGAN, Justice.

The Fourth District Court of Appeal has certified the following question as one of great public importance:

MAY THE FLORIDA PATIENT’S COMPENSATION FUND MAINTAIN AN ACTION FOR INDEMNITY AGAINST A NEGLIGENT EMPLOYEE OF A HOSPITAL MEMBER OF THE FUND ON WHOSE BEHALF THE FUND HAS PAID A CLAIM PREDICATED SOLELY UPON THE EMPLOYEE’S NEGLIGENCE?

*866Higley v. Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund, 506 So.2d 483, 487 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution. We answer the certified question in the negative and quash the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Florida Patient's Comp. Fund v. Von StetinaSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Allstate Ins. Co. v. FowlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. METROPOLITAN PROPERTY v. Chicago Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. Marina Del Americana, Inc. v. MillerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  5. Higley v. Florida Patient's Compensation FundDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. TALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL MED. CTR., INC. v. MeeksSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. Meeks ex rel. AdamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API