Legal Opinion

People v. Whyte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 2011PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). The Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (Board) prepared a risk assessment instrument (RAI) that classified defendant as a level one risk. Following a hearing, however, County Court agreed with the People that additional points should be assessed under three risk factors, and thus defendant was presumptively classified as a level two risk. The court also noted that, in the event that it had not assessed the additional points, it…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. DexterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. People v. McDanielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. People v. RatcliffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. New York State Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders v. RansomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. DarrahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. People v. JuneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. JUNE, HEATH E., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. People v. WeihrichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. People v. WeihrichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API