Legal Opinion

Clawans v. District of Columbia

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 28, 1932No. 5694PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRONER, Associate Justice.

Criminal information was filed against plaintiff in error (defendant) charging her with having engaged in the business of a railroad ticket broker without obtaining' a license as required by Act of Congress of July I, 1902 (32 Stat. 622, 625, 628 [D. C. Code 1929, T. 20, §§ 861, 885, 912]). The act makes the offense punishable by a fine. She was convicted, and we granted a writ of error in order that we might consider the assignment of error to which we shall now refer.

At the trial several railroad detectives testified they had purchased from defendant return coupons…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Murray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Gillman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Koch v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Redsecker v. WadeOregon Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Charles M. Luck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  2. Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  3. Campbell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  4. Bostic v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  5. Lawrence E. Kitchen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API