Legal Opinion

Redsecker v. Wade

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1913PublishedCited by 27 opinions

From Multnomah.: George N. Davis, Judge. This is an action by F. H. Redsecker against N. J. Wade, in which plaintiff recovered judgment and defendant appeals. Respondent now moves to strike from the files appellant’s bill of exceptions. Department 1. Department 1. Statement by Mr. Justice Ramsey. This is an action to recover money alleged to be due upon a promissory note and upon certain accounts. The defendant set up several counterclaims.

Read the full summary

From Multnomah.: George N. Davis, Judge. This is an action by F. H. Redsecker against N. J. Wade, in which plaintiff recovered judgment and defendant appeals. Respondent now moves to strike from the files appellant’s bill of exceptions. Department 1. Department 1. Statement by Mr. Justice Ramsey. This is an action to recover money alleged to be due upon a promissory note and upon certain accounts. The defendant set up several counterclaims. There was a verdict and a judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $2,825. The defendant appeals. The facts appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The plaintiff respondent here moves the court to strike from the files.the defendant’s bill of exceptions filed June 16, 1913, and sundry exhibits filed on the following day. He states as grounds for his motion:

_ “ (1) The alleged bill of exceptions does not, in relation to any exception therein noted or mentioned, contain any evidence or other matter necessary to explain such exception or any exception therein.

“(2) Prom the transcript of testimony attached to the said alleged bill it affirmatively appears that there was introduced at the trial documentary evidence, consisting of some…

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State of Oregon v. PirkeyOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Malloy v. Marshall-Wells Hardware Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  5. Roe v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1928

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API