Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Reniff

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 10, 1939No. A-9605PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarefoot, J.

Petitioner alleges that he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty in the penitentiary, for the reason that he has served the length of time to fulfill the prison terms allotted to him. The record, as revealed by the response filed by the Attorney General, shows that petitioner was convicted and sentenced from Muskogee county for a period of one year for forgery. This was his second term, he having theretofore served a sentence. He was received at the penitentiary on September 24, 1930, and was dischargd on February 28, 1931. He was next sentenced from the district court of Comanche county to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ogle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
  2. Hunter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Ex Parte AutryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Goodson v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  5. State v. FinchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. STATE v. NELSONCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
  2. STATE v. NELSONCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
  3. STATE v. NELSONCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API