Legal Opinion

Murrow v. Clifford

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 30, 1974No. 73-1717PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal brings before us the recurring contention that an aspect of state administration of a public assistance program conflicts with the Social Security Act and with the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment. In a class action the plaintiffs claim to represent a class of women who have been medically determined to be pregnant and who (1) have applied for benefits under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 601-610, for the first time for themselves and the fetus in útero, or (2) are receiving…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Burns v. AlcalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Ruth Friedman v. Stephen Berger, Individually and as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  3. Fitzpatrick v. BitzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  4. Doe v. BealCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  5. Williams v. WohlgemuthCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API