Interocean Steamship Corp. v. Amelco Engineers Co.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PECKHAM, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action seeking to recover in excess of $36,000 on an oral contract which called for it to procure stevedoring services. Defendant has moved to dismiss for lack of admiralty jurisdiction, but concedes that diversity jurisdiction exists. Upon hearing on the motion to dismiss, however, defendant sought to raise the issue of improper venue, which he alleges would not lie in this district if jurisdiction is based upon diversity alone. Thus, the following determinations are before the court:(1) Is there admiralty jurisdiction?(2) If…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kossick v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- New Jersey Steam Navigation Company v. MERCHANTS'BANK.Supreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Insurance Co. v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- State Industrial Comm'n of NY v. Nordenholt Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Archawski v. HaniotiSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Peralta Shipping Corporation v. Smith & Johnson (Shipping) Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- The Hinkins Steamship Agency, Inc. v. Freighters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Hinkins Steamship Agency v. Freighters, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1972