Legal Opinion · Dissent

SER American Electric Power v. Hon. David W. Nibert, Judge

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 2016No. 15-0819Published

1DissentLoughry, Justice

(Filed April 15, 2016)

Given the preponderance of factors that weigh heavily in favor of resolving the under1 lying action in our sister state of Ohio, the majority’s decision rests on decidedly infirm grounds and, as a consequence, I am compelled to dissent. In affirming the' circuit court’s refusal to dismiss the underlying action on grounds of forum non conveniens, .the majority adopted the circuit court’s improper focus on the existence of minimal contacts with this state while intentionally overlooking the clear indicia which demonstrate that Ohio, and not West Virginia, is the preferred…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Pollux Holding Ltd. v. The Chase Manhattan Bank, Springwell Navigation Corporation v. The Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  3. Abbott v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. EstesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  5. MacE v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API