Legal Opinion

In re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court, of the State, Goldstein

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 15, 2010No. 610, 2009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Justice.

This is an attorney disciplinary proceeding. The Board on Professional Responsibility (Board) concluded that Respondent, Lee C. Goldstein, Esquire, violated the Delaware Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Responsibility (Rules) in the course of conducting 10 closings for a private money lender. The Board recommended the sanction of a private reprimand. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) filed objections and recommended the sanction of a public reprimand. After carefully reviewing the record, we conclude that a public reprimand is the appropriate sanction.

Facts

Respondent has…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re BaileySupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  2. In Re DavisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  3. In Re KatzSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re GoldsteinSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API