Fruit Dispatch Co. v. Rainey
Texas Supreme Court
Original application to the Supreme Court for writ of mandamus requiring the judges of the Fifth Judicial District to certify a question to the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Phillips
The relator prays for a mandamus directed to the members of the Honorable Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth Supreme Judicial District for the certification to this court of the correctness of their action in the disposition of a certain ease to which relator was a party.
The case was originally a suit in the Justice Court, Precinct No. 1, Dallas County, wherein the relator was plaintiff, against certain defendants, and in' which on trial in that court relator as plaintiff recovered Judgment. One of the defendants sought to appeal to the County Court at law of Dallas County, but as held by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pecos & North Texas Railway Co. v. Canyon Coal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1909
- Ware v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Turnbow v. J. E. Bryant Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916
- Ft. Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. v. MathewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Fruit Dispatch Co. v. Independent Fruit Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Speaker v. LawlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Hooks v. Texas Department of Water ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Perkins v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Sells v. RooseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Shults v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.