Brown v. . Hillsboro
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion
Since the above case was argued before us, the plaintiff has moved for a new trial, upon the ground of newly discovered evidence. We said, in Johnson v. R. R., 163 N.C. 431, at p. 453, that "applications of this kind, as we have held, should be carefully scrutinized and cautiously examined, and the burden is upon the applicant to rebut the presumption that the verdict is correct, and that there has been a lack of due diligence. 14 A. E. 790. We require, as prerequisite to the granting of such motions, that it shall appear by the affidavit: (1) That the witness will give the newly discovered…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Hall v. Thomason Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. . DegraffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- State v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State v. . StarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.