Legal Opinion

Hurd v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided April 13, 2001No. A-7571PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

In this appeal, we are asked to clarify the relationship between the crimes of coercion and kidnapping. The State alleges that Leonard P. Hurd committed both of these crimes. According to the State's evidence, Hurd invited another man to his house and then held him captive, refusing to let him leave until he agreed to transfer thousands of dollars of property to Hurd. The question is whether Hurd's restraint of the other man will support a separate conviction for kidnapping or whether, instead, this restraint should be deemed "incidental" to the crime of coercion. We…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. LevyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. People v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. LombardiNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Warren P. Berry. Appeal of Warren Berry. Appeal of Guillermo BrignoniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  5. Marks v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Garza v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  2. Hurd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
  3. West v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010
  4. Cleveland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011
  5. Garza v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API