Legal Opinion
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. a/s/o Richard Lucka
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 27, 2016No. 45A04-1604-CT-831PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Judge.
[1] Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (‘Watts”) appeals the trial court’s order denying its motion to compel arbitration. Watts raises three issues which we consolidate and restate as whether the trial court erred in denying its motion. We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
[2] Watts and State Farm Fire & Casualty, Co. (“State Farm”) were signatories to a Property Subrogation Arbitration Agreement (the “Arbitration Agreement”), which provided in part:
By signing this Agreement, the company accepts and binds itself to the following:
Article First
Compulsory Provisions Signatory…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chiron Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Local No. 358, Bakery & Confectionery Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- MPACT Construction Group, LLC v. Superior Concrete Constructors, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Small v. Centocor, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- VIP, Inc. v. KYB Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Allstate v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- LAGUNAS v. OLD NATIONAL BANKDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2024
- State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Watts Water Tech., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- VIP, Inc. v. KYB Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020