Legal Opinion

Krugh v. Laurich

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County

Decided February 11, 1991No. 1989-225PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KAYE, J.,

Eugene W. Krugh Jr. and his wife Cynthia Krugh, have filed an action against Laurich Co. Inc., for breach of implied warranties of good workmanship and habitability in the construction of plaintiffs’ current residence. Defendant has filed two preliminary objections to the complaint which are presently before the court for disposition. First, defendant demurs to the cause of action for breach of implied warranty of habitability on the ground that the alleged defects in plaintiffs’ home do not render it unfit for habitation. The *667second objection is in the nature of a request for a more…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pugh v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. ELDERKIN Et Ux. v. GasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Harkins v. ZamichieliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Vernali v. CentrellaConnecticut Superior Court · 1970
  5. Groff v. Pete Kingsley Building, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Moorman v. Tower Management Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API