Legal Opinion · Dissent

Okleshen v. Rune & Sons, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 5, 1969No. Gen. 52,524Published

1DissentCraven, J.

I concur in the majority opinion insofar as it relates to the defendants Gordon K. Nelson and Marion Nelson. I cannot agree that the opinion of the Supreme Court in Driscoll is determinative of the issue of liability as to the defendant Rune. I would affirm the judgment entered upon the verdict of the jury against that defendant. There are many issues presented by this appeal but in view of the majority opinion exonerating Rune, as a matter of law, these issues need be mentioned only in passing. The trial court correctly determined complex issues as to instructions, evidence and the possible…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lance v. SeniorIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Driscoll v. C. Rasmussen Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Svienty v. Pennsylvania RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API