Board of Aldermen v. Maniace
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.
A Land Court judge sitting by designation in the Superior Court concluded that the defendants’ application for a special permit and site plan approval had been granted constructively and allowed their motion for summary judgment.2 The ensuing appeal by the board of aldermen of Newton *830(board)3 brings before us the same question as was before the trial court judge, that is: “[W]hether the timely filing of a document which sets forth the action of the [board], including the votes of each member, but giving reasons extraneous to the result of the vote, indeed, even reasons which would apply to a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- MacGibbon v. Board of Appeals of DuxburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- Konstantopoulos v. Town of WhatelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. Board of Appeals of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- Subaru of New England v. BD. OF APPEALS, CANTONMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Capone v. Zoning Board of Appeals of FitchburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Board of Aldermen v. ManiaceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Telecorp Realty, LLC v. Town of EdgartownDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
- Board of Aldermen v. ManiaceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Boespflug v. Community Housing Resource, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2007