Legal Opinion

Board of Aldermen v. Maniace

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 1, 1998No. 97-P-1774PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.

A Land Court judge sitting by designation in the Superior Court concluded that the defendants’ application for a special permit and site plan approval had been granted constructively and allowed their motion for summary judgment.2 The ensuing appeal by the board of aldermen of Newton *830(board)3 brings before us the same question as was before the trial court judge, that is: “[W]hether the timely filing of a document which sets forth the action of the [board], including the votes of each member, but giving reasons extraneous to the result of the vote, indeed, even reasons which would apply to a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. MacGibbon v. Board of Appeals of DuxburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  2. Konstantopoulos v. Town of WhatelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Gulf Oil Corp. v. Board of Appeals of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  4. Subaru of New England v. BD. OF APPEALS, CANTONMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  5. Capone v. Zoning Board of Appeals of FitchburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Board of Aldermen v. ManiaceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  2. Telecorp Realty, LLC v. Town of EdgartownDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
  3. Board of Aldermen v. ManiaceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. Boespflug v. Community Housing Resource, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API