Legal Opinion

General Carpet Contractors, Inc. v. Tidwell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHATTIN, Justice.

For convenience, the parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court: that is, plaintiff-in-error as the plaintiff and defendant-in-error as the defendant.

Plaintiff brought suit in the Circuit Court of Shelby County to recover $8,-079.00 in use taxes, including penalty and interest, paid under protest to defendant. The action was heard by the circuit judge without a jury. The trial judge found the assessment and collection of the taxes were proper and dismissed the suit. Plaintiff has perfected an appeal to this Court.

The salient facts are basically…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. BoydTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Louisville Property Co. v. Mayor of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Hall Contracting Corp. v. TidwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Plough v. PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. W. J. Savage & Co. v. MayfieldTennessee Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Woods v. M. J. Kelley Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Friessen Const. Co., Inc. v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Friessen Const. Co., Inc. v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API