Noble County v. Rogers
Indiana Supreme Court
1DissentBoehm, Justice
I respectfully dissent. I do not believe that a suit for wrongful enjoinment implicates the Tort Claims Act. Rather, I would conclude that, under Trial Rule 65(C), a governmental entity seeking a preliminary injunction voluntarily assumes the obligation to pay costs and damages arising from a wrongful injunction. As a result, the claim by a person wrongfully enjoined is not one arising in tort and the Tort Claims Act, which bars only claims "in tort," does not preclude recovery of those costs and damages from a governmental entity. More importantly, the majority's approach does nothing to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Campbell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Mullin v. Municipal City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Nintendo of America, Inc. v. Lewis Galoob Toys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Brinkman v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.