Legal Opinion
Elliot Megdal & Associates v. Daio USA Corp.
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Decided January 30, 1998No. 17345PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATANABE, Judge.
In this lawsuit stemming from the breach of a commercial lease, Defendant-Appellant Daio USA Corporation (Daio USA) and its parent company, Defendant-Appellant Daio Company, Ltd. (Daio Japan), (collectively Defendants) appeal from (1) the interim judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit (circuit court) on February 18, 1993, holding Defendants jointly and severally liable to Plaintiff-Appellee Elliot Megdal and Associates (Megdal) for $108,708.89 in accrued breach of lease damages, but retaining jurisdiction to issue “further judgments for [Megdal’s] future…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,191 General Acquisition, Inc. v. Gencorp, Inc., Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc., Wagner & BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,552 International Controls Corp. v. Robert L. Vesco, and Vesco & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fujimoto v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Choice Financial Group v. SchellpfefferNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. OlsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Zelmer v. 21st Century Towing, Inc. (In re Zelmer)District Court, D. Oregon · 2002