Legal Opinion

People v. Barlow

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 1980No. Crim. 10568PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McDANIEL, J.

In this case we are called upon to decide if the defendant was deprived of his constitutional rights when he was allowed to plead guilty without the assistance of counsel, the crux of that issue being whether defendant’s waiver of his right to counsel occurred in keeping with acceptable constitutional standards where the trial court, in so many words, did not expressly warn the defendant of.the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation.

By information filed July 22, 1976, defendant was charged with felony drunk driving. (Veh. Code, § 23101, subd. (a).) The record…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Adoption of Alexander S.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. In Re MossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. People v. LongwithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API