State Bank of Ardock v. Burke
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Biedzell, J".
This is an appeal from a judgment and from an order denying the plaintiff’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial. The action is predicated upon the alleged conversion of certain flax described in a chattel mortgage given to the plaintiff. The flax was purchased by the defendant and the price paid to the mortgagor. Later the defendant refused: to' deliver the flax to the plaintiff upon demand; hence this action.
The facts necessary to be stated are substantially as follows:: In the fall of 1921, one Eobinson, being indebted to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- First State Bank v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Towner v. Lucas' ex'orSupreme Court of Virginia · 1857
- Thomas & Sons v. Loose, Seaman & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Phillips v. MeilySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
- Livingston v. StevensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Zimmer v. BellonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- Hanes v. MitchellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
- Kramer v. K. O. Lee & Son Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Kittelson v. ColletteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Ex Parte St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.