Legal Opinion

State Bank of Ardock v. Burke

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Biedzell, J".

This is an appeal from a judgment and from an order denying the plaintiff’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial. The action is predicated upon the alleged conversion of certain flax described in a chattel mortgage given to the plaintiff. The flax was purchased by the defendant and the price paid to the mortgagor. Later the defendant refused: to' deliver the flax to the plaintiff upon demand; hence this action.

The facts necessary to be stated are substantially as follows:: In the fall of 1921, one Eobinson, being indebted to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. First State Bank v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Towner v. Lucas' ex'orSupreme Court of Virginia · 1857
  3. Thomas & Sons v. Loose, Seaman & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  4. Phillips v. MeilySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  5. Livingston v. StevensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Zimmer v. BellonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Hanes v. MitchellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Kramer v. K. O. Lee & Son Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Kittelson v. ColletteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Ex Parte St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API