Ex Parte St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
The opinion of the Court of Appeals here sought to be reviewed shows that in a suit for loss from fire, in which the insurer is sued, and defendant pleads the breach of a clause respecting the ownership by insured of the personal property covered, in that though' insured had a bill of sale to the property with no defeasance clause expressed, it was by parol agreement of the parties to it intended to operate as a mortgage to secure a debt, and that by it plaintiff was not the sole and unconditional owner, for the reason that a mortgagee is not that sort of owner. Westchester…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wodock v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Westchester Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. v. Home Ins.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Shriner v. MeyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Parish v. GatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Moorer v. Tensaw Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Hester v. First Nat. Bank of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Bankers & Shippers Ins. Co. of New York v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Bradley v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- National Security Fire and Casualty Co. v. NewmanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.