Legal Opinion

Ex Parte St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 16, 1938No. 6 Div. 345PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The opinion of the Court of Appeals here sought to be reviewed shows that in a suit for loss from fire, in which the insurer is sued, and defendant pleads the breach of a clause respecting the ownership by insured of the personal property covered, in that though' insured had a bill of sale to the property with no defeasance clause expressed, it was by parol agreement of the parties to it intended to operate as a mortgage to secure a debt, and that by it plaintiff was not the sole and unconditional owner, for the reason that a mortgagee is not that sort of owner. Westchester…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wodock v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  2. Westchester Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. v. Home Ins.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Shriner v. MeyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Parish v. GatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Moorer v. Tensaw Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Hester v. First Nat. Bank of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Bankers & Shippers Ins. Co. of New York v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. Bradley v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. National Security Fire and Casualty Co. v. NewmanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API