Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Davison

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 30, 1922PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action to recover $1,000 paid by the plaintiff on June 19, 1919, for certain mining stock which was to be delivered on November 1, 1919. The declaration is in five counts; the first and second are in contract, the others, in tort, were waived.

There was evidence that the defendant was engaged in the *239business of a broker and had in his employ one Davy; that Davy, undertaking to act for the defendant, on or about June 10, 1919, in a conversation with the plaintiff respecting the Liverpool Silver Mines Company located in Montana told him that the defendant was offering for sale stock…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morse v. WoodworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Henderson v. SyndicateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. Jennings v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Kumin v. FineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. Anthony & Cowell Co. v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Richards v. ForrestMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Lunn & Sweet Co. v. WolfmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Friend Lumber Co. v. Armstrong Building Finish Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Courtney v. Charles Dowd Box Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  5. Plumer v. Houghton & Dutton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API