Legal Opinion

Hinds v. Harbou

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the St. Joseph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

This is an action brought by Harbou against the appellant, Hugh L. Hinds, and the Studebaker Brothers Manufacturing Company, to recover for injuries suffered by Harbou, which he claims were occasioned by the negligence of the appellant and of the said corporation. The complaint is in three paragraphs:

In the first paragraph, the appellee charges, that he was a carpenter, and was employed in his trade by the Studebaker Brothers Manufacturing Company, to labor in and about the constructing of a building, which the company was then erecting, to be used by them as a wagon and carriage factory;…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Osborne v. MorganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  3. Forgey v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Rogers v. OvertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Fulwider v. IngelsIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API