Legal Opinion

Tom Barrow Company v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 26, 1992No. A92A0435PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

The question in this appeal concerns the application of “the Little Miller Act” (OCGA § 36-82-100 et seq.) to a materialman that furnished materials to a second tier subcontractor on a public works project. The record shows that the materialman, Tom Barrow Company, sued Ra-Lin & Associates, Inc., a general contractor, and St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ra-Lin’s bonding company, under OCGA § 36-82-104 (b) on the payment bond required by OCGA §§ 13-10-1 and 36-82-101 for the amount owed, interest, and attorney fees, and that the defendants were granted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Home Indemnity Co. v. Battey MacHinery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. Ray v. City of DaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. Sunderland v. Vertex Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  5. Tonn & Blank, Inc. v. D. M. Asphalt, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bates & Associates, Inc. v. RomeiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  2. Barton Malow Co. v. Metro Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Gulf Insurance v. GFA Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. Barton Malow Co. v. Metro Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. Barton Malow Co. v. Metro Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API