Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Cellco Partnership
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 7, 2012No. 10 Civ. 9168 (SAS)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Patrick “Tony” Campbell brings this diversity action against Célico Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Inc. (hereinafter “Verizon”),1 alleging claims of racial discrimination and retaliation under the New York State Human Rights Law (“NYSHRL”)2 and the New York City Human Rights Law (“NYCHRL”).3 Campbell is an African-American and a citizen of New York.4 Verizon is a Delaware corporation, with its principal place of business in New Jersey.5 Verizon now moves for partial summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs discrimination…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Gorman v. Covidien, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Davis-Bell v. Columbia UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Taylor v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Ellis v. Century 21 Department StoresDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Musante v. Mohawk Valley Community CollegeDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.