Legal Opinion

David C. Patch and Mary Jo Patch v. Amoco Oil Company, Amoco Oil Company, Third Party v. Chemlime Corporation, Third Party

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 23, 1988No. 87-6098PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

Amoco Oil Company suffered a summary judgment dismissal of its indemnity claim against Chemlime Corporation when the district court ruled that the indemnity agreement, under which Chemlime is in-demnitor and Amoco is indemnitee, did not satisfy the express negligence requirement under Texas law. That order became ap-pealable by the entry of a Rule 54(b) certificate. Because, under any theory of the indemnity agreement’s effect, Amoco’s right of indemnity cannot be resolved at this stage, the summary judgment must be reversed. Until Amoco’s culpability for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ethyl Corp. v. Daniel Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Fisher Construction Company v. RiggsTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Fisher Construction Company v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Adams v. Spring Valley Construction Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  5. Keystone Equity Management v. Thoen, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. English v. BGP International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  2. Continental Steel Co. v. H.A. Lott, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  3. Construction Investments & Consultants, Inc. v. Dresser Industries, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
  4. Crimson Exploration, Inc. v. Intermarket Management, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  5. Constructors & Associates, Inc. v. Fisk Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API