Legal Opinion

Continental Steel Co. v. H.A. Lott, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided May 22, 1989No. 05-87-01072-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

STEWART, Justice.

We grant appellee’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our prior opinion, and substitute this opinion as the opinion of the Court.

This appeal concerns the construction of an indemnity agreement between appellant Continental Steel Company (Continental) and appellee H.A. Lott, Inc., (Lott). The sole contested issue is whether the agreement obligates Continental to indemnify Lott for Lott’s costs and expenses incurred in its successful defense of a claim based solely on Lott’s alleged negligence. We hold that the agreement does create such an obligation;…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ethyl Corp. v. Daniel Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Argonaut Southwest Insurance Company v. MaupinTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Ideal Lease Service, Inc. v. Amoco Production Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Fisher Construction Company v. RiggsTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Petroleum Personnel, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fisk Electric Co. v. Constructors & Associates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Corp. v. Texaco, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
  3. Tubb v. Bartlett, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1993
  4. Tenneco Oil Co. v. Gulsby Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Boorhem-Fields, Inc. v. Burlington Northern Railroad, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API