Legal Opinion
In re Clarification of an Appropriate Unit
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 19, 1996No. C3-96-699Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
By writ of certiorari, relator Winona County Non-Union Employees Association (Association) appeals from a Bureau of Mediation Services (BMS) unit clarification order determining that the Public Employment Labor Relations Act (PELRA) prohibits a confidential supervisory employee from remaining in a supervisory bargaining unit represented by the Association.
FACTS
The County of Winona (County) is a public employer within the meaning of PELRA, MinmStat. §§ 179A.01-.30 (1994). The Association is a labor organization certified by the BMS as the exclusive representative of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Arvig Telephone Co. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Nadeau v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- County of Scott v. Public Employment Relations BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council No. 14 v. County of ScottCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995