Legal Opinion

Picard v. Pittsburgh & Ohio Valley Railway Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 3, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 13731PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GOURLEY, Chief .Judge.

This is an action Under the Safety Appliance Act to recover damages for injuries sustained while plaintiff was employed as a brakeman for the Pittsburgh and Ohio Valley Railway Company, 45 U.S.C.A. §§ 9 and 11.

Upon jury trial verdict was returned In favor of plaintiff in the amount of $75,000, and the jury, in answer to specific interrogatories, found defendant .guilty of violating the Safety Appliance Acts which in each instance was a substantial contributing factor in bringing about the accident.1.The matter before the court relates to defendant’s motion for new trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carter v. Atlanta & St. Andrews Bay Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
  3. Pearl Thomas, Administratrix of the Estate of Lewis Samuel Thomas, Deceased v. Conemaugh & Black Lick Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  4. McCarthy v. American Eastern CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  5. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mazer v. LipshutzDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API