Picard v. Pittsburgh & Ohio Valley Railway Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
GOURLEY, Chief .Judge.
This is an action Under the Safety Appliance Act to recover damages for injuries sustained while plaintiff was employed as a brakeman for the Pittsburgh and Ohio Valley Railway Company, 45 U.S.C.A. §§ 9 and 11.
Upon jury trial verdict was returned In favor of plaintiff in the amount of $75,000, and the jury, in answer to specific interrogatories, found defendant .guilty of violating the Safety Appliance Acts which in each instance was a substantial contributing factor in bringing about the accident.1.The matter before the court relates to defendant’s motion for new trial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carter v. Atlanta & St. Andrews Bay Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Pearl Thomas, Administratrix of the Estate of Lewis Samuel Thomas, Deceased v. Conemaugh & Black Lick Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- McCarthy v. American Eastern CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mazer v. LipshutzDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962