Legal Opinion

Suttles v. Dickey

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 16, 1941No. 13568PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reid, Chief Justice.

1. Construing the provisions of the Code, §§ 92-7701, 92-7702, 110-1001, in the light of former interpretations made in Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Wright, 124 Ga. 596 (53 S. E. 251), Darby v. DeLoach, 190 Ga. 499, and Reynolds v. Hardin, 187 Ga. 40 (200 S. E. 119), claims for taxes should be enforced within seven years from the date when they are due and when executions could have been issued therefor (§ 92-5102), unless within such time an execution is issued and entered on the general execution docket, as in the case of judgments. Easterlin v. New Home Sewing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Easterlin v. New Home Sewing Machine Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Oliver v. JamesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Darby v. DeloachSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Reynolds v. HardinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aldridge v. Federal Land Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  2. Eckerd Corp. v. Fayette County Board of Tax AssessorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  3. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  4. Eckerd Corp. v. Fayette County Board of Tax AssessorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Oxford v. JessupCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API