Legal Opinion

Hardcastle v. Kratz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 16, 1983No. 83-915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMES, Acting Chief Judge.

The sheriff appeals from a final order denying forfeiture of a jeep involved in a drug transaction. The order reads as follows:

THIS CAUSE having come to be heard upon the Petition for Rule to Show Cause and for Final Order of Forfeiture of JIM D. HARDCASTLE, SHERIFF OF SARASOTA COUNTY, and the Court having been advised in its premises, it is

Findings of Fact

Special Agent Cornelius of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement met with Rudolph Kratz several times about purchasing two kilos of cocaine. At these meetings, the cocaine was to be delivered from Kratz to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Platt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  2. Kenneth Leroy Howard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. United States v. One 1977 Cadillac Coupe Deville Vin: 6d47s7q234771Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. ONE DODGE COUPE, ETC.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  5. In re Forfeiture of 1979 Toyota Corolla Automobile Vin KE30619534District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Duckham v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Flam v. City of Miami BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Heinrich v. MillerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Barton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API