Jasso v. State

OPINION

KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice.

Appellant Jaime Antonio Jasso appeals his aggravated-robbery conviction, arguing: (1) the evidence is legally insufficient to support his conviction; (2) a pretrial identification procedure, alleged to have been unduly suggestive, tainted the complainants’ in-court identification of appellant; and (8) appellant was entitled to a mistrial because polygraph examination results were revealed at trial. We affirm.

I. Factual and ProceduRal Background

The complainants, Amanda Cardillo and Catherine Walbom, were robbed at knife-point after leaving a nightclub in the…