Legal Opinion · Dissent

Alexander v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 2004No. COA03-1215Published

1DissentHudson, Judge

Having carefully reviewed the deposition and medical notes of Dr. Harris, I conclude that the majority has incorrectly applied the standard of review to finding of fact number 20. The crucial portion of the finding, which is quoted entirely in the majority opinion, says that “The greater weight of the evidence establishes that plaintiff’s ruptured disc was a result of his accident on April 8, 1999. Dr. Harris’ testimony, taken as a whole, establishes that it was ‘likely’ that the rupture occurred during the accident.” Because the evidence does support this finding, I respectfully dissent.

Altho…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Adams v. AVX Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Deese v. Champion International Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Anderson v. LINCOLN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Adams v. AVX CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Poole v. Tammy Lynn CenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API