Legal Opinion
Holcomb v. United States
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided April 25, 1978No. 74-C-501PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WARREN, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, John and Ruth Holcomb, have filed a motion for attorneys’ fees in this action. Both plaintiffs and defendant, United States, have filed with the Court a Bill of Costs in this action.
On March 9, 1978, the Clerk of Courts, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin held that the costs of the action must be borne by each party because there was no prevailing party for the purposes of assessing costs pursuant to Rule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Courts found that defendant’s total…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sidney Clark and Julia Clark v. Universal Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Best Medium Publishing Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellee v. The National Insider, Inc., Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
- In Re KlineDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- First Commodity Traders, Inc. v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Key Buick Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Rice v. Sunrise Express, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2002
- Steven M. Kipperman and Stephanie Kipperman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Bryant v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.