Vineberg v. . Day
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal from W. J. Adams, J., from Guileoed, beard by consent at chambers, 3 January, 1910. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
"Walkee, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff against the defendants, who constitute the Board of Examiners in Optometry in this State, for the purpose of obtaining a peremptory writ of mandamus, compelling the defendants to issue to him a license to practice optometry in the State, without undergoing an examination as to his qualifications, by virtue of the provisions of Laws 1899, ch. 444. Section 5 of the said act provides for an examination by the board, in order to ascertain whether the applicant is qualified, by learning or experience, to practice optometry. Tbe purpose of tbe act…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ward v. Commissioners of Beaufort CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Barnes v. Commissioners.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Glenn v. Commissioners.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- County Board of Education v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Burton v. . FurmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
3Cited by3 opinions
- Board of Education v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- City of Abbeville v. RenfroeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Mann v. North Carolina State Board of Examiners in OptometrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934